fedora-it community site on Ubuntu server
tcallawa at redhat.com
Mon Jan 10 15:57:35 UTC 2011
On 01/10/2011 10:51 AM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 01/10/2011 03:10 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
>> Heck, large chunks of Fedora's own infrastructure run on RHEL.
> Is there any particular reason why we are doing that?
> Does it not discredits Fedora as a viable server platform if we do that?
> Honestly should we be eating our own dog food and all that?
We do this because the lifecycle of Fedora is not compatible with
providing and maintaining a long life hosting infrastructure. Does that
mean that Fedora is not an ideal platform for server deployments lasting
longer than a year and a half? Yes, in my humble opinion.
Don't get me wrong, the lifecycle of Fedora is great for many things,
but the lifecycle of RHEL is far more appropriate for our hosting and
More information about the advisory-board