Dear Fedora board, please open your trac

Toshio Kuratomi a.badger at
Tue Jan 11 00:18:55 UTC 2011

On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 06:14:05PM -0500, Tom Callaway wrote:
> On 01/10/2011 06:13 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
> > On 01/10/2011 04:06 PM, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> > 
> >> Here is my proposal how to make communication with the board more
> >> efficient:
> >>
> >>      1. The board opens it's trac instance at
> >>
> > 
> > The board will continue to require some form of private instance/method
> > for sensitive matters, but I'm sure we're all for improving transparency
> > all around.  If making a public trac instance is a good way to do that,
> > so be it.
> This is probably feasible, assuming we have a way to mark tickets as
> private. (and we don't open the old tickets)
IIRC it isn't but I could be misremembering.  Even if that's the case, we
could do something like have two separate trac instances and encoursage
people to use the public instance unless there's a reason for it to be
private.  Or have requests sent to the board in private and board members
open the tickets on one or the other.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : 

More information about the advisory-board mailing list