multi-desktop DVD criteria
awilliam at redhat.com
Fri Jan 14 21:27:17 UTC 2011
On Fri, 2011-01-14 at 14:17 -0700, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > "Must have an approved test plan on file with the Fedora Quality
> > Assurance team
> > Test plan should be written involving members of the QA team
> > Test plan must be executed by someone, with review by a member of the QA
> > team. NB: this requires at least 2 people to participate in the testing.
> > The above must be in place in sufficient time to allow testing, and
> > remediation of uncovered issues, to occur"
> > *None* of this was is part of the spins process.
> It should be. And if it means we drop all our spins... I am ok with that.
Um. This seems radical. As I wrote on the comment page for the draft,
this whole thing seems to have been drawn up without any engagement with
the QA team at all, which hardly seems the best way to do things. If
you'd asked us, we may well have come up with a different way of doing
things. In point of fact, QA, the desktop group and the other various
desktop teams have come up with a testing process for at least all the
desktop spins over the last couple of releases which has proven to work
well, although it doesn't exactly match what's in your draft. Perhaps it
would have been better to work with the QA group and the various spin
groups to decide what would be appropriate QA for spins rather than
simply deciding it (apparently) unilaterally.
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
More information about the advisory-board