Fedora website, Red Hat, copyright notices and FPCA
metherid at gmail.com
Wed Jun 29 15:40:23 UTC 2011
On 06/29/2011 08:26 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> Right. I'm not arguing with you that the FPCA does not cover this. I'm
> asking, do we want to move away from relying on good faith (current
> practice) to forcing maintainers to hunt down license information when they
> do this?
Nope. I am only suggesting explicit licensing as a alternative where we
rely on FPCA default license now. If we are relying on good faith in
other cases, we can continuing doing that with the recommendation (not
a mandate) to consider explicit licensing whenever possible.
More information about the advisory-board