Looking for feedback on Fedora COC Enforcement Draft

[seth vidal]

On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 20:40 -0500, Brian Pepple wrote:

> == Community Working Group ==
> 
> If involved parties feel the decision of the moderators/channel
> operators were unfair or biased, they can raise the issue to the
> Community working group. The CWG may appoint a mediator or decide
> directly on the issue themselves.
> 
> Some things to try/consider:
> 
>       * If you bring an issue to the CWG, they may not decide the issue
>         in your favor. Be understanding of any decisions made. 
>       * Handling of the issue could be reviewed and feedback for
>         moderators/mailing lists managers provided. This may result in
>         changes to policy, so be aware if you bring it up you may change
>         things for the area you are working in. 
>       * Final decision takes place here. 
        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

_Final_ decision takes place at the CWG?

How is the CWG appointed/elected? How long are they granted seats? 

If the CWG decides against someone are they, then, OUT of fedora? Is it
an excommunication? A Censure? 

-sv