Looking for feedback on Fedora COC Enforcement Draft

[Joerg Simon]

CWG thanks for the hard work! Thumbs up for the conduct - not so happy
with the enforcement draft ;)

On 03/02/2011 02:40 AM, Brian Pepple wrote:
>       * Final decision takes place here. 

As far as i understood the CWG was a temporary *working* group of
*appointed* group members. Not a enforcing group.

To have a clear conduct is very helpful to have a common ground to deal
with things - if things can not solved "at the lowest level first" - i
propose, let the certain Steering Commitees and Groups deal with conduct
violation - like as example here
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ambassadors/dispute_resolution

If things are so wrong that it comes to exclude members from the whole
Project - the FPL and Board as a elected body should be involved and do
the decission making.

cu Joerg
-- 
Joerg (kital) Simon
jsimon at fedoraproject.org
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JoergSimon
http://kitall.blogspot.com
Key Fingerprint:
3691 0989 2DCA 58A2 8D1F 2CAC C823 558E 5B5B 5688

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 261 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/advisory-board/attachments/20110302/755cebe6/attachment-0001.bin