Improving the Spins process

Jon Stanley jonstanley at gmail.com
Fri Oct 14 20:40:50 UTC 2011


On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 11:28 AM, Jared K. Smith
<jsmith at fedoraproject.org> wrote:

> 1) We discussed whether the desktop media should go through the same
> process, essentially treating it just like we treat the rest of the
> spins.  This would give us a more organized way to review the
> kickstart file, make sure the design team is happy with the artwork,
> etc. just like we would for spins.  I think this is probably a good
> idea, but would love more feedback from the desktop folks and the
> design team before making a final decision on this.  The intention is
> not to add a layer of bureaucracy, but to simply help add some
> structure to what is currently fairly unstructured.

I obviously can't speak for the desktop or design teams, but in
general, I think that this proposal is sound. I've always found it odd
that what the desktop team does is not subject to the same review that
we put any other spin through - I fail to see how they are
important/different/whatever from the rest of the spins that we
produce. Same sentiment goes for the KDE spin.


More information about the advisory-board mailing list