Endorsement of https://github.com/fedoraproject

[Josh Boyer]

On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 5:43 PM, seth vidal <skvidal at fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Feb 2012 17:39:56 -0500
> Bill Nottingham <notting at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> Jesse Keating (jkeating at redhat.com) said:
>> > On 2/6/12 2:30 PM, seth vidal wrote:
>> > >On Mon, 06 Feb 2012 14:20:25 -0800
>> > >Jesse Keating<jkeating at redhat.com>  wrote:
>> > >
>> > >>On 2/6/12 8:42 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>> > >>>So another question to be considered is whether github provides a
>> > >>>service that isn't available from other, open source
>> > >>>third-parties.
>> > >>
>> > >>gitorious being the closest open source alternative.
>> > >>
>> > >
>> > >What about gitlabhq?
>> >
>> > Looks like it was started in 2011, which was after I did any looking
>> > into this market :)
>>
>> I may be blind, but it also doesn't look like gitlabhq is actually
>> offering hosting/a service - they'll give you the code so you can
>> host your own.
>>
>
> correct they don't - however we may have the capacity to host that in
> FI.

Argh.  Why?  We already have fedorahosted.org which hosts git trees.
We also have fedorapeople.org, which can easily host git trees per user.
I don't see the need to host ANOTHER git tree hosting thing at all.

josh