Board question regarding non-software goods.

Peter Robinson pbrobinson at gmail.com
Thu Feb 23 12:41:58 UTC 2012


On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 9:05 AM, Jaroslav Reznik <jreznik at redhat.com> wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
>> On Wed, 2012-02-22 at 17:44 -0500, David Nalley wrote:
>> > Need for swag is discussed and agreed to by regional groups such as
>> > FAmNA, EMEA Ambassadors, in public. Designs either generated or
>> > proofed by Fedora Design (or are designs that have been generated
>> > or
>> > approved in the past) and are then ordered
>>
>> FWIW there has been more than a trivial amount of swag that has not
>> gone
>> through design team approval and print-ready artwork has not been
>> proofed with the design team, resulting in incorrect colors (RGB
>> instead
>> of correct CMYK colorspace) and the wrong usage of fonts (usually due
>> to
>> not flattening fonts to paths) in the final product. For the most
>> part,
>> logo manipulations do go through either the logo queue or the Design
>> team, but I have been disappointed in the past by designs with errors
>> that could have been prevented.
>
> The question is more about producing already approved/designed (by Design
> team) designs, mostly already produced before as if I understand the
> policy draft correctly - the approval is needed for *every* new order.

My understanding of the requirements for every order from last weeks
call is the quantity and locations need to be tracked to prove active
and continued usage of the trademark by RHT which is part of the
requirements for keeping the trademark.

Peter


More information about the advisory-board mailing list