Connotation analysis for Fedora Project codenames
Rex Dieter
rdieter at math.unl.edu
Tue Mar 27 16:29:16 UTC 2012
On 03/27/2012 10:59 AM, Máirín Duffy wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-03-27 at 10:55 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
>> On 03/27/2012 10:11 AM, Máirín Duffy wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2012-03-27 at 06:52 -0700, Robyn Bergeron wrote:
>>>> We could, theoretically, just add "No Name, F18 and beyond" in the list
>>>> with all other release names, in one vote.
>>>
>>> The issue with this approach is that it leaves the folks who like having
>>> names but dislike the current 'is a' process without a say.
>>
>> this is the first I've heard of anyone suggesting using anything other
>> than the "is a" approach. Prior, I'd only heard the semi-common
>> suggestion to abolish release names altogether.
>
> Read back through the thread; there are several such suggestions.
I'll take your word for it, the thread has already gotten beyond
managable for me to follow.
I'd kindly and humbly suggest that anyone currently in *this* thread not
speaking directly to the topic in $SUBJECT "Connation analysys" , that
you start a new thread to discuss $SOME_OTHER_SUBJECT
-- rex
More information about the advisory-board
mailing list