Unofficial Fedora Remix being advertised on the project front page
"Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
johannbg at gmail.com
Wed Oct 16 16:45:58 UTC 2013
On 10/16/2013 04:06 PM, inode0 wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 11:00 AM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
> <johannbg at gmail.com> wrote:
>> There is nothing but good to have plethora of remixes however we cannot be
>> wasting project resources dealing with their problems ( depending how far
>> the unofficial remixes are from as and which component they add which we do
>> not ship it can be extremely difficult to reproduce the bug they are
>> experiencing. )
> What is an example of an official remix? I don't understand the
> distinction between official and unofficial remixes? Aren't all
> remixes outside the scope of the Fedora Project and unofficial from
> our perspective?
I thought so as well.
>
>> But any how is it different that we advertise and point to for example
>> rpmfusion.org but we can point to unofficial remix?
> Pidora does not contain anything prohibited by Fedora as far as I
> know.
Today it contains nothing that is prohibited by Fedora tomorrow it might
which is the problem with 3rd party remixes and who's supposed to keep
tab of that so their advertisement can be brought down as soon as they do?
JBG
More information about the advisory-board
mailing list