Unofficial Fedora Remix being advertised on the project front page

["Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"]

On 10/16/2013 06:46 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 07:35:26PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
>
>> I agree with Jared's sentiment here. I'm not sure why Pidora should
>> get any special promotion over any of the other remixes or secondary
>> architecture and by being a secondary architecture there's no
>> guarantee that things like security fixes are delivered in the same
>> timeframe as the mainline Fedora.
> Why is 3D printing given any special promotion over any other Fedora
> feature? Why are TechRepublic given more promotion than any other media
> outlet that reviewed Fedora? Why is Robyn on the front page instead of
> any other community member?
>
> Marketing promotes things that they feel benefit the project as a whole.
> Promoting Pidora while there's still extreme media interest in Raspberry
> Pi is a rational decision. Have any of the other spins or remixes made
> an argument for inclusion on the front page that marketing agree with?
>

Has there not been half a decade atleast argument in the community for 
the other then the "default" desktop environments as well as other 
"spins" to get equal representation of their product, an place on the 
front page, links etc on par with "default" so fourth and so on?

But I understand since "pidora" is Red Hat special case why it got 
chosen over all other rPI releases out there and why it got landed on 
the front page from the marketing team over of our own projects products 
or "spins" just like that...

JBG