[Fedora-ambassadors-list] Are we in a state of Chaos?

[Tejas Dinkar]

The following definition is good enough for me.

It is interesting, that here we are defining an ambassador on a
moral/ethical definition rather than a hard written one.

I Like it :)

I don't know how to close a thread, but I got my answers.

Tejas

On Fri, 2006-04-21 at 15:40 -0400, Alex Maier wrote:
> The official mission statement for the Ambassadors group is: "Fedora
> Ambassadors are people like you and me, who go to places where other
> Linux users and potential converts gather and tell them about
> Fedora—the project and the distribution."
> 
> Our aims are:
> 
>     *      Represent Fedora Project to the wider public
>     *      Help spread the word about Fedora, Linux, and Open Source
>     *      Be a point of contact for local community members and
> channel the feedback to Fedora Project
>     *      Help recruit project contributors
>     *      Think of creative ways for promoting Fedora in your region
> 
> Any activity that does not contradict the mission statement and the
> declared aims can be part of the Ambassadors project.
> 
> Nobody on the Steering Committee is policing what
> initiatives/activities should or should not be part of the Ambassadors
> project, as long as they are not contrary to our Aims and our Mission.
> 
> This is not chaos. This is Freedom.
> 
> Ambassadors are free to spread the word about Fedora in any way they
> want, as long as it's legal, of course, and does not harm the image of
> Fedora. Limiting ourselves to only certain type of activity, but not
> others, will only harm us in the long run.