[Fedora-ambassadors-list] 3 Simple Questions
Tejas Dinkar
tejasdinkar at gmail.com
Tue Mar 21 12:33:16 UTC 2006
On Tue, 2006-03-21 at 09:21 +0200, Filip Tsachev wrote:
> I think that "isn't the best as a server" is questionable because
> "server" has quite a few meanings. If you meant production server I
> think this is mentioned on some of the official web pages as a myth,
> no?
well, I didn't word that perfectly, but in essence, what i was trying to
get across was that
* If you find Fedora the best in some domain such as desktop, or it is
the best for laptops, then tell people that. In essence, I was trying to
say - 'If you feel that Fedora isn't the best for some use, then WE
won't force you to promote it as that'.
For example, I advocate Fedora on the desktop, but I feel that in some
scenarios, "foo-bar linux" may be better, say as a web server,
especially if you don't have the bandwidth to download upgrades, and
want packages that have been thoroughly tested.
So when I talk to people, I don't blindly say - "use fedora, it will do
wonders for your server", as I can't honestly say it will. (IMO of
course)
That example was just my way of saying that Being A Fedora Ambassador,
doesn't mean you need to think that fedora is the greatest thing since
sliced bread.
Gja's $0.02
--
Tejas Dinkar - tejasdinkar AT gmail DOT com
No group of professionals meets except to conspire against the public at large.
-- Mark Twain
More information about the ambassadors
mailing list