[Fedora-ambassadors-list] FAMSCo election?

[Thomas Canniot]

Le lundi 22 mai 2006 à 21:33 +0530, Rahul Sundaram a écrit :
> On Sat, 2006-05-20 at 14:51 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > Hi
> > 
> > Since FESCo is going through a process of democratization now, would it
> > be a good idea for FAMSCo to follow on its footsteps? The current
> > steering committee was sort of elected through a informal voting process
> > in a IRC channel but that doesnt scale.
> > 
> > The current steering committee
> > 
> > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ambassadors/SteeringCommittee
> > 
> > If you havent followed what Fedora Extras has been doing,
> > 
> > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SteeringCommittee/Nominations
> > 
> > There isnt a structure in place for Fedora Extras packagers to do the
> > actual voting yet but we can probably reuse whatever they come up with.
> > Replace cvsextras group with ambassadors group in the accounts system
> > and we should be ok.
> 
> Does anyone have anything to say about this? Everyone happy with the
> status quo?
> 
> Rahul
Elections are a good thing. However, I don't really know if it will be
very relevant to vote for/against people we barely know.

-- 
Thomas Canniot
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/ThomasCanniot
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/ambassadors/attachments/20060522/267ff17c/attachment.sig>