[Ambassadors] North America / South America ambassador meetings

[Charlie]

On Mon, 7 Jul 2008 20:09:25 +0200, "Francesco Ugolini"
<fugolini at fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> 2008/7/7 inode0 <inode0 at gmail.com>:
>> On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 10:26 AM, Greg Dekoenigsberg <gdk at redhat.com>
> wrote:
>>> Which leaves North America.
>>>
>>> North American ambassadors: I would like to propose a bi-weekly
> meeting.
>>> Roll call: who would be interested in such a meeting?
>>
>> As long as the meetings consist of more than roll call followed by
>> cancellation for lack of a quorum. :)
>>
>> John
>>
>> --
>> Fedora-ambassadors-list mailing list
>> Fedora-ambassadors-list at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-ambassadors-list
>>
> 
> I think it's necessary a continuity to cancel the Meeting Chair's
> "Lack of quorum" nightmare.
> 
> I saw that if there is constance holding those meetings, people will
> easily remember it and will join it, if this one is broken people will
> forget to attend those ones.
> 
> Naturally this is the tip of the iceberg, but I wanted to share with
> all of you that lesson I've learned: people need a reason, a place and
> the voice :), with those elements you will have a successful meeting
> (leadership included).
> 
> Naturally, if I would able to attend I will do it.
> 
> Regards
> 
> Francesco Ugolini
> 
> --
> Fedora-ambassadors-list mailing list
> Fedora-ambassadors-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-ambassadors-list


I agree with Francesco that having consistency in the meeting dates will
help participants remember, and plan to attend.  With regular meetings also
comes the ease of advertising those meetings to would-be participants.

By having a tighter schedule (every two weeks) we can ensure that if you
miss a meeting, or one is canceled, you will not have to wait very long to
address a topic in that forum.

--
Charlie