[Ambassadors] Request for comments : Fedora media distribution process draft

Ankur Sinha sanjay.ankur at gmail.com
Mon Nov 22 11:35:29 UTC 2010

On Fri, 2010-11-19 at 17:25 +0500, Mustafa Qasim wrote:
> * As pointed by Marcus we should update the if-else explanation with a
> simple flow chart diagram.

Yes, I'll look into this when I can squeeze out some time. The rest of
the page is fairly verbose, so someone who doesn't understand the
if-else part should still know what the draft intends. 

> * The Local (in person & by mail) contact records should be the
> responsibility of the concerning ambassador team to keep it update and
> verify before adding. So, people get efficient response and in case of
> any issue can move to other available person and report any
> non-responsive provider/volunteer to the concerning ambassador group.

Yes, we know that this is what *should* be done. Can you suggest a work
flow that would ensure that these requirements are fulfilled please? 

> * Any individual shouldn't add his name in the list for the sake of
> up-to-date provider list. He should ask any of the his regional
> ambassador if he/she is interested. 

What list are we referring to here? The Local Contacts list, or the
vendors' list? Can you also be more specific about what you mean by
"regional ambassador". Do you mean "regional mentor"?


More information about the ambassadors mailing list