[Ambassadors] [summary] objection against bckurera.

[Danishka Navin]

I copied this mail to Amabassador list

To all FAMSCO members,

I am really disappointed about your poor decision.

You can't control our local decisions as we have freedom in putting the
person who represent from Sri Lanka.
No representation is better than sending such a person.


It was NOT a communication mistake!


Contribution is not about the how much you make noise on Fedora list or IRC.

I am really disappointed about your poor decision and I have been working
for several year for Fedora (more than 5years).
We have done much work but never fool the community. and

If I was him I wont come back to the election.

Seems, I should think about my Fedora contribution again.


To other members:

We kindly asked to withdraw Sri Lankan Ambassadors own nomination as there
was a bad thing happened in here (LK).
But now he or some one else put his name again.
We (Sri Lankan community talked with some of the Fedorians privately but I
think its time to make this public.
(sorry about that)

You have full freedom to do what ever you prefer at the election but...
Please please....think before cast your vote.


Bye for now. (I am leaving from FUDcon)

Danishka



On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 9:21 AM, Neville A. Cross <neville at taygon.com> wrote:

> On Sat, 2011-11-05 at 12:57 -0400, Jon Stanley wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 11:15 AM,  <neville at taygon.com> wrote:
> >
> > > At FAmSCo meeting[0] we discussed about this situation. The agreement
> is
> > > that there is no reason to stop one Fedora Ambassador to run for a
> FAmSCo
> > > election. It is to the voters to choose who will represent them
> better. In
> > > any case, if we have more candidates that will better represent the
> > > community in general, we all be benefited from that. If some one think
> > > that can do it better than any of the current candidates, there is
> still
> > > time for nominations.
> >
> > I think that this is good general advice (speaking for myself,
> > obviously). In the past, we've had people running for various spots in
> > the project that I thought would not serve the community well, and I
> > let my voice be heard with my votes, not trying to quash their
> > candidacy. Reading through this, I think that this is just another
> > such situation.
> >
> > However, I'm not quite certain what the "fraud" below refers to. It
> > sounded to me like he held a poorly organized FAD (and largely
> > undocumented, for lack of a camera, which I can't incredibly fault him
> > for) in Sri Lanka (which is one of the reasons that FAD's exist, BTW -
> > it's a mechanism to take small, measured risk. If it fails in it's
> > objectives, we're not out a ton of money)
> >
> > Is there anything specific you'd like the Board to do, or is this just
> > more of an FYI?
>
>
> Yes, the intention was to made the board aware of the situation.
>
> Fraud is a strong word. Now most people involved has level down to
> mis-communication. I see all of this as part of a learning process.
>
> Best regards
>
>
> --
> Neville A. Cross
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Yn1v
> Linux User #: 473217
>
>


-- 
Danishka Navin
http://danishkanavin.blogspot.com
http://twitter.com/danishkanavin
http://www.flickr.com/photos/danishkanavin/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/ambassadors/attachments/20111106/c91aed7b/attachment.html>