[Ambassadors] Petition for Board to dissolve FAmSCo and call new elections

Christoph Wickert christoph.wickert at googlemail.com
Thu Apr 19 18:42:10 UTC 2012


Am Donnerstag, den 19.04.2012, 00:09 -0500 schrieb Alejandro Perez:
> I have read this proposal and John, point of view is 100% accurate, 4 of
> 7 FAMSCO cannot change last election result, in any case this issue
> should be decide by unanimous vote.

Hi Alejandro

I'd like to add something here:
     1. If one member is inactive we can no longer reach an unanimous
        vote of all 7 members
     2. We did have an unanimous vote of the remaining 6 members when we
        ratified the current election guidelines including the paragraph
        we confirmed again yesterday.
     3. We *do* respect the last election results and this is why we
        wanted to take it us it to determine the people who have to run
        for re-election after only 6 months.

It seems this doesn't work and therefor I'd like to have all seats
subject to the elections in F18.

> It will wise to wait for next term to have elections with the new rules
> where everyone running for a famsco seat knows them and that it will not
> change in the middle of the term.

Please be so kind as to read the links I gave in my previous mail. It
explains why *all* FAmSCo members want to switch to the new guidelines
ASAP.

If you still have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask and if you
disagree, please speak up. We do appreciate every opinion.

Kind regards,
Christoph




More information about the ambassadors mailing list