[Ambassadors] FAD APAC 2013

Truong Anh. Tuan tuanta at iwayvietnam.com
Thu Aug 29 09:31:36 UTC 2013

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ankur Sinha" <sanjay.ankur at gmail.com>
> To: ambassadors at lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2013 7:13:23 AM
> Subject: Re: [Ambassadors] FAD APAC 2013
> On Tue, 2013-08-27 at 14:13 +0700, Truong Anh. Tuan wrote:
> > This is also a good chance for teams who would like to bid for FUDCon
> > APAC
> > 2014 to lobby for their bid. If you want to do, you should prepare
> > your
> > plan as good as possible before coming to this FAD.
> > If we can do that, this FAD would become both Ambassadors FAD and
> > FUDCon
> > Planning FAD. Is that also good? Any ideas?
> Tuan,
> The FAD is supposed to be for all APAC contributors. Since it's not at
> all about spreading Fedora and rather getting work done, I reckon it
> should actually have *more* folks from other Fedora teams than from
> ambassadors. I propose we send out mails to each of the local mailing
> lists asking interested folks to join the fudcon-planning list, since I
> think that's the correct channel for this event (We don't have a FAD
> planning list, do we?). This mail will also request them to blog about
> what they're doing at Fedora currently and add their links to the talk
> page as I just suggested. [1]
> For the FUDCon planning, I would be OK with *one* representative of each
> local team that wants to bid for the FUDCon at the most: I see no point
> of having the entire teams down. Having the event owners come down
> should be enough.
> To clarify, rather reiterate: the FAD is NOT an ambassador event like a
> release party or user interaction session. It is about getting work
> done. Please keep this in mind when you propose tasks that you'd want
> done at the FAD. (If we don't have enough work that can be done, we
> don't need a FAD.)
> [1]
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/ambassadors/2013-August/021596.html

More information about the ambassadors mailing list