[Ambassadors] Ambassadors places in new Working Groups

[Mathieu Bridon]

On Sun, 2013-10-27 at 14:46 +0100, Nobrakal wrote:
> 2013/10/27, Ankur Sinha <sanjay.ankur at gmail.com>:
> > On Sun, 2013-10-27 at 12:27 +0100, Nobrakal wrote:
> >> In my mind, Ambassadors are more near of users than developers or
> >> marketing team. Ambassadors organize all the events, submit new
> >> idea... It is really important to have at least an ambassador in WG
> >
> > I don't think Amabssdors must be part of the WGs, unless they also have
> > a skill set relevant to the WG. For example, Tuan isn't just an
> > ambassador. He works with servers and therefore brings certain knowledge
> > that will be useful to the WG.
> 
> That great, for Tuan and Cwickert. But my problem is that neither
> email was sent on the ambassadors list.

Honestly, if you don't follow up the other lists, then I can't
understand how you can do a good job of representing Fedora.

And really, the working groups are about **making** Fedora. Ambassadors
are about **promoting** it. If you want to be part of those who make
Fedora, then you're not just an ambassador any more, you become one of
the developers. (and then you really should follow the lists where this
was announced)


-- 
Mathieu