[Ambassadors] Proposing Andrew Ward (Award3535) as new mentor for NA
Neville A. Cross
yn1v at taygon.com
Tue Oct 7 19:09:30 UTC 2014
El 2014-10-07 12:16, inode0 escribió:
> On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 12:21 PM, Neville A. Cross <yn1v at taygon.com>
>> The new procedure to make this as transparent and quicker states that
>> a new
>> mentor should be nominated by a current mentor and then this should be
>> to the mailing list for comments.
> I haven't been paying attention to the new mentor process but I can't
> imagine a process asking for feedback on a mailing list like this one
> being a good idea. If someone were to say something negative about a
> proposed mentor should that really be documented forever on a public
> mailing list? I don't think anyone nominated should be subjected to
> that even being a possibility.
This process was sent to mentor mailing list for comments. There was no
I am aware of the shortcomings of making a not_so_positive comment in
public. Commenting on the ticket on trac will be also a permanent
record, probably not as visible as a mailing list. Reaching out
privately to a FAmSCo member may end discussed on the meeting anyway.
Meeting logs are also permanent records. One item discussed while
figuring out this process was the meaning of no comments. So, maybe
there is no need to say something not-so-good.
I think is good that there is a written process. We ended up having a
mentor that was not approved ambassador. I am not sure it is perfect
porcess. This is the first case, so this is a test. The process may be
amended looking at the results. John, I highly value your input as a
thoughtful person. Please do share your views on how to improve this.
More information about the ambassadors