[fedora-arm] F15 armv5tel update

Mark Salter msalter at redhat.com
Fri Nov 4 15:41:20 UTC 2011


On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 17:48 -0700, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
> On 10/25/2011 04:06 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
> > http://djdelorie.fedorapeople.org/armv5tel-vs-armv7hl.html
> 
> Cool!
> 
> What is the plan for reconciling the differences?
> 
> A few packages stand out as being particularly concerning:
> 
...
> glibc: Both have arm patches, but are they the same patches?

I started looking at 2.14.7.arm0 (v5) vs 2.13.90.9.0.arm1 (v7) this
morning. It is not clear to me if glibc-2.14.7.arm0 does have arm
specific patches. 2.13.90.9.0.arm1 does have:

 glibc-arm-mathdefs.patch
 glibc-arm-tzdata.patch
 glibc-arm-clone-unwind.patch

It looks like glibc-arm-tzdata.patch isn't needed in 2.14.7.

Upstream commit 998832a46688b9fb3a101eccae77bc45e7c1d7ab:

  Author: Andreas Schwab <schwab at redhat.com>
  Date:   Fri Nov 4 14:39:05 2011 +0100

    Always provide declarations of long double math functions when !_LIBC

appears to fix the problem glibc-arm-mathdefs.patch tries to work
around. It is a simple patch which easily backports to 2.14.7.

The arm-clone-unwind is still needed and applies to 2.14.7.

So, I'm in the process of building the 2.14.7 glibc for armv7hl with
the long double math and unwind patches added.

--Mark





More information about the arm mailing list