[fedora-arm] 3.10 ARM kernel configs

[Josh Boyer]

On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 4:26 PM, Dave Jones <davej at redhat.com> wrote:
> On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 09:13:30PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
>  > On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 9:07 PM, Dave Jones <davej at redhat.com> wrote:
>  > > On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 02:02:12PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
>  > >  > I would feel extremely bad if I pushed something to git that didn't even
>  > >  > pass 'make prep'.  As a compromise, I added this line in kernel.spec:
>  > >  >
>  > >  > @@ -1451,6 +1451,8 @@ mkdir configs
>  > >  >  rm -f kernel-%{version}-*debug.config
>  > >  >  %endif
>  > >  >
>  > >  > +rm -f kernel-%{version}-arm*.config
>  > >  > +
>  > >  >  # now run oldconfig over all the config files
>  > >  >
>  > >  > So the ARM configs won't be included in the prep run.  That lets things
>  > >  > progress on all the other arches for now.  Just remove that line, fix
>  > >  > things up, and push out.
>  > >
>  > > FYI, I've just done the same thing in f18 during the 3.9 rebase.
>  > > I don't see us pushing this out until 3.9.1 lands, but please sort out the
>  > > config options there too.
>  >
>  > Thanks, I'll look at it now, for <= F-18 we still support v5tel so I
>  > need to deal with that.
>  >
>  > Any idea on eta for 3.9.1?
>
> Probably sometime this week I would guess. There's already over a hundred
> patches queued on Linux-stable for 3.9
>
> Greg typically seems to wait until Linus tags rc1, so whenever the merge
> window closes, you can probably expect 3.9.1 to land pretty soon afterwards.

I'm kinda hesitant on that plan.  We seem to always pull in some
patches from -rc1 that wind up being broken and fixed with a later RC,
or reverted outright.  Of course, there isn't a great answer there but
maybe we can bump the karma requirement up when the update is filed?

josh