[fedora-arm] Automatic AArch64 bootstrap daily update for September 4, 2013

Al Stone ahs3 at redhat.com
Wed Sep 4 23:14:42 UTC 2013


On 09/04/2013 02:47 PM, Mark Salter wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-09-04 at 21:58 +0200, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
>> W dniu 04.09.2013 14:08, Brendan Conoboy pisze:
>>> Total current build failure count: 851 failed
>>>
>>> Build failures from unsatisfied dependencies: 357 failed-dep-rpms
>>> See http://arm-temp.ausil.us/pub/fedora-arm/data/failed-dep-rpms  for complete list.
>>>
>>> Build failures after dependency resolution: 494 failed-build-rpms
>>> See http://arm-temp.ausil.us/pub/fedora-arm/data/failed-build-rpms  for complete list.
>>
>> acpid is on a list. But:
>>
>> [builder at model-1 SPECS]$ rpmbuild acpid.spec
>> warning: bogus date in %changelog: Thu Oct 23 2007 Zdenek Prikryl
>> <zprikryl at redhat.com> - 1.0.6-3.fc9
>> [builder at model-1 SPECS]$ vi acpid.spec
>> [builder at model-1 SPECS]$ rpmbuild -ba acpid.spec
>> error: Architecture is not included: aarch64
>>
>> So it should be removed.
>
> Yeah. There are about 100 packages failing for same reason. Some are
> are packages we'd want to port, others don't make sense for aarch64.
> The scripts are crude. We could add a blacklist or query src.rpm, but
> if we move to koji soon, it doesn't matter.
>
> BTW, the scripts are on the server at:
>
>    http://arm-temp.ausil.us/pub/fedora-arm/bin/
>

Actually, this package needs to stay for AArch64; ACPI will
be in use.  It's on my list of things to do to fix this.

-- 
ciao,
al
-----------------------------------
Al Stone
Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc.
ahs3 at redhat.com
-----------------------------------


More information about the arm mailing list