[fedora-arm] arm Digest, Vol 78, Issue 15
sreedevi_d
sreedevi_d at ecil.co.in
Sat Jan 18 03:16:13 UTC 2014
Hello..
we are using linux kernel 2.6.14 for our project.we need to upgrdae this..could help in this regard.
Regards,
D.SREEDEVI,
Technical Manager,
SSD,R&D.
ECIL.
-- Original Message --
From: arm-request at lists.fedoraproject.org
To: arm at lists.fedoraproject.org
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 16:06:07 +0000
Subject: arm Digest, Vol 78, Issue 15
Send arm mailing list submissions to
arm at lists.fedoraproject.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
arm-request at lists.fedoraproject.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
arm-owner at lists.fedoraproject.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of arm digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Pandaboard kernel 3.12.7 (Sid Boyce)
2. Re: Pandaboard kernel 3.12.7 (Peter Robinson)
3. Re: Pandaboard kernel 3.12.7 (Sid Boyce)
4. Re: system with FXS port (Omalley_s)
5. Re: system with FXS port (Peter Robinson)
6. Re: BeagleBone Black CPU speed (Robert Nelson)
7. Re: system with FXS port (Robert Moskowitz)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 14:31:03 +0000
From: Sid Boyce <sboyce at blueyonder.co.uk>
To: arm at lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: [fedora-arm] Pandaboard kernel 3.12.7
Message-ID: <52D93EA7.9000307 at blueyonder.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
I am currently running this kernel # uname -r
3.9.5-301.fc19.armv7hl
I blocked upgrading of the kernel as it caused a non-booting system.
kernel headers 3.12.7-300.fc20 have been installed.
Is it now safe to upgrade the kernel to 3.12.7?
Regards
Sid.
--
Sid Boyce ... Hamradio License G3VBV, Licensed Private Pilot
Emeritus IBM/Amdahl Mainframes and Sun/Fujitsu Servers Tech Support
Senior Staff Specialist, Cricket Coach
Microsoft Windows Free Zone - Linux used for all Computing Tasks
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 14:35:59 +0000
From: Peter Robinson <pbrobinson at gmail.com>
To: sboyce at blueyonder.co.uk
Cc: arm at lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: Re: [fedora-arm] Pandaboard kernel 3.12.7
Message-ID:
<CALeDE9N8x3Y758sxhj_sREHyqQE4hh+5_bYsA3uKi-VYNwbwUw at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 2:31 PM, Sid Boyce <sboyce at blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
> I am currently running this kernel # uname -r
> 3.9.5-301.fc19.armv7hl
>
> I blocked upgrading of the kernel as it caused a non-booting system.
>
> kernel headers 3.12.7-300.fc20 have been installed.
>
> Is it now safe to upgrade the kernel to 3.12.7?
Not that I'm aware of.
Peter
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 15:06:09 +0000
From: Sid Boyce <sboyce at blueyonder.co.uk>
To: arm at lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: Re: [fedora-arm] Pandaboard kernel 3.12.7
Message-ID: <52D946E1.1060807 at blueyonder.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
On 17/01/14 14:35, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 2:31 PM, Sid Boyce <sboyce at blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
>> I am currently running this kernel # uname -r
>> 3.9.5-301.fc19.armv7hl
>>
>> I blocked upgrading of the kernel as it caused a non-booting system.
>>
>> kernel headers 3.12.7-300.fc20 have been installed.
>>
>> Is it now safe to upgrade the kernel to 3.12.7?
> Not that I'm aware of.
>
> Peter
>
Thanks Peter,
The last I saw on 8th. November after I experienced a non-booting system
when the kernel was updated:-
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTE: It uses the old F19 kernel as the new F20 kernel doesn't boot
on Panda -> do not update the kernel.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Jaromir.
--------------------------------------------------------
Regards
Sid.
--
Sid Boyce ... Hamradio License G3VBV, Licensed Private Pilot
Emeritus IBM/Amdahl Mainframes and Sun/Fujitsu Servers Tech Support
Senior Staff Specialist, Cricket Coach
Microsoft Windows Free Zone - Linux used for all Computing Tasks
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 10:07:15 -0500
From: Omalley_s <omalley_s at rocketmail.com>
To: Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com>, "Jared K. Smith"
<jsmith at fedoraproject.org>
Cc: arm <arm at lists.fedoraproject.org>
Subject: Re: [fedora-arm] system with FXS port
Message-ID: <idg55f11d4r8w6m10jvgccbf.1389971235178 at email.android.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
The mirabox and d3 both have mini pci slots, but I don't think either are supported by fedora. Getting it to work might not be that bad depending on what they did with the bootloader.
I am guessing that if you have a kernel driver for your pci card for x86, it should be able to be compiled into the arm kernel without a lot of fuss.
I would love one to try.
Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com> wrote:
On 01/14/2014 03:52 PM, Jared K. Smith wrote:
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 3:15 PM, Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com> wrote:
I am looking for a arm board, supported by Fedora, with an FXS port to work with Asterisk.
I'm not aware of anything out there at this time. I have heard of people using a mini-pcie to pcie bridge to use a standard PCI-E FXS card, but that seems to me to be overkill.
I am not finding ANY usb-fxs dongles out there. Just the openusbfxs project which is rather stagnant.
Which arm boards have mini-pci? At least I have a pci fxs card, if I have to go that way, but I would first shop around for a mini-pci fxs card.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/arm/attachments/20140117/524fd520/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 15:12:33 +0000
From: Peter Robinson <pbrobinson at gmail.com>
To: Omalley_s <omalley_s at rocketmail.com>
Cc: arm <arm at lists.fedoraproject.org>
Subject: Re: [fedora-arm] system with FXS port
Message-ID:
<CALeDE9PoNjNLW6F8UJC7BB616YwYDM-n7AWPW3KMtP6kWff1CA at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 3:07 PM, Omalley_s <omalley_s at rocketmail.com> wrote:
> The mirabox and d3 both have mini pci slots, but I don't think either are
> supported by fedora. Getting it to work might not be that bad depending on
> what they did with the bootloader.
>
> I am guessing that if you have a kernel driver for your pci card for x86, it
> should be able to be compiled into the arm kernel without a lot of fuss.
>
> I would love one to try.
People have got the Mirabox to work with Fedora using our default
kernel. The issue is that because the supplied uboot doesn't support
DT you've got to faff about with appending it and we don't support
that OOTB although in and of itself it's not hard to do.
Peter
>
>
>
> On 01/14/2014 03:52 PM, Jared K. Smith wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 3:15 PM, Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> I am looking for a arm board, supported by Fedora, with an FXS port to
>> work with Asterisk.
>
>
> I'm not aware of anything out there at this time. I have heard of people
> using a mini-pcie to pcie bridge to use a standard PCI-E FXS card, but that
> seems to me to be overkill.
>
>
> I am not finding ANY usb-fxs dongles out there. Just the openusbfxs project
> which is rather stagnant.
>
> Which arm boards have mini-pci? At least I have a pci fxs card, if I have
> to go that way, but I would first shop around for a mini-pci fxs card.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> arm mailing list
> arm at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 09:19:46 -0600
From: Robert Nelson <robertcnelson at gmail.com>
To: Peter Robinson <pbrobinson at gmail.com>
Cc: Fedora ARM secondary architecture list
<arm at lists.fedoraproject.org>
Subject: Re: [fedora-arm] BeagleBone Black CPU speed
Message-ID:
<CAOCHtYic_YmwgoQGU0Gqnga4MxMgG8-mWJ0KxG27_S6SZHKtdA at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 3:52 AM, Peter Robinson <pbrobinson at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 7:14 PM, Robert Nelson <robertcnelson at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 12:10 PM, Steve Underwood <steveu at coppice.org> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> It looks like the BeagleBone Black is still running at 550MHz with the
>>> latest Fedora 20. Does anyone know what is holding it back from running at
>>> 1GHz? Is the a uboot thing, or a kernel thing, or something else? I saw a
>>> version of uboot referred to as making the BBB run at 1GHz, but when I tried
>>> experimenting with that I got the same 550MHz clock speed.
>>
>> with v3.12.x:
>> These 5 patches are needed:
>> https://github.com/RobertCNelson/linux-dev/tree/am33x-v3.12/patches/cpufreq
>>
>> or with v3.13-rcX:
>> https://github.com/RobertCNelson/linux-dev/blob/am33x-v3.13/patches/dts/0002-arm-dts-am335x-boneblack-add-cpu0-opp-points.patch
>
> I've enabled the generic cpufreq support, we had it disabled as when
> it first landed it had problems.
>
> The BBB is booting with 3.13rc8 with no patches but there's a few
> issues I need to resolve this week with USB so I'll review that for
> the BB patchset to make sure it's there. Is it queued to go upstream
> for 3.14?
3.14 is closed, I'm cleaning my patches listed in that repo and
planning to post to l-a/l-o after v3.14-rc1 hits..
Talking with CircuitCo, they would prefer the default pinmux to be
setup like so:
http://elinux.org/Basic_Proto_Cape
So i'm adding those changes to the push too..
Regards,
--
Robert Nelson
http://www.rcn-ee.com/
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 11:05:52 -0500
From: Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com>
To: Omalley_s <omalley_s at rocketmail.com>, "Jared K. Smith"
<jsmith at fedoraproject.org>
Cc: arm <arm at lists.fedoraproject.org>
Subject: Re: [fedora-arm] system with FXS port
Message-ID: <52D954E0.6090106 at htt-consult.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; Format="flowed"
On 01/17/2014 10:07 AM, Omalley_s wrote:
> The mirabox and d3 both have mini pci slots, but I don't think either
> are supported by fedora. Getting it to work might not be that bad
> depending on what they did with the bootloader.
>
> I am guessing that if you have a kernel driver for your pci card for
> x86, it should be able to be compiled into the arm kernel without a
> lot of fuss.
>
> I would love one to try.
I was reminded that with spandsp, you can get a v32modem to function as
an fxs port. Of course this puts the burden for i/o handling on your
cpu. Use to do this lots of years ago, and really forgot those days.
You do have to watch out for how disk i/o could interupt the modem handling.
I am hoping with a duo-core arm, like the cubie2 or truck and a smallish
SSD drive (what do I need for storage anyway?), I can get this working
with a usb modem. Will also test out the cisco SPA-112 which is supose
to have all the functionality I need.
This is now slotted as a feb/mar project.
thanks all for the advice. Though a 'real' fxs for an arm board would
be the makings of a real home pbx solution.
>
>
>
> Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 01/14/2014 03:52 PM, Jared K. Smith wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 3:15 PM, Robert Moskowitz
>> <rgm at htt-consult.com <mailto:rgm at htt-consult.com>> wrote:
>>
>> I am looking for a arm board, supported by Fedora, with an FXS
>> port to work with Asterisk.
>>
>>
>> I'm not aware of anything out there at this time. I have heard of
>> people using a mini-pcie to pcie bridge to use a standard PCI-E FXS
>> card, but that seems to me to be overkill.
>
> I am not finding ANY usb-fxs dongles out there. Just the openusbfxs
> project which is rather stagnant.
>
> Which arm boards have mini-pci? At least I have a pci fxs card, if I
> have to go that way, but I would first shop around for a mini-pci fxs
> card.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/arm/attachments/20140117/59054d71/attachment.html>
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
arm mailing list
arm at lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
End of arm Digest, Vol 78, Issue 15
***********************************
::DISCLAIMER::
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The contents of this e-mail and any attachment(s) are confidential and intended for the named recipient(s) only.
It shall not attach any liability on the originator or ECIL or its affiliates. Any views or opinions presented in
this email are solely those of the author and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of ECIL or its affiliates.
Any form of reproduction, dissemination, copying, disclosure, modification, distribution and / or publication of
this message without the prior written consent of the author of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this email in error please delete it and notify the sender immediately. Before opening any mail and
attachments please check them for viruses and defect.
THIS MAIL IS SCANNED BY ECIL IMSS FOR VIRUS AND SPAMS.
::DISCLAIMER::
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The contents of this e-mail and any attachment(s) are confidential and intended for the named recipient(s) only.
It shall not attach any liability on the originator or ECIL or its affiliates. Any views or opinions presented in
this email are solely those of the author and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of ECIL or its affiliates.
Any form of reproduction, dissemination, copying, disclosure, modification, distribution and / or publication of
this message without the prior written consent of the author of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this email in error please delete it and notify the sender immediately. Before opening any mail and
attachments please check them for viruses and defect.
THIS MAIL IS SCANNED BY ECIL IMSS FOR VIRUS AND SPAMS.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/arm/attachments/20140118/b0fb9e11/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the arm
mailing list