Fwd: gmaven
Peter MacKinnon
pmackinn at redhat.com
Wed Jun 12 16:26:13 UTC 2013
With respect to JSP compilation in Hadoop, I think we should stay the
course through Fedora 19
(https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=396972) but this
is something we'll definitely want to track.
We'll have two options when we need to act (all things being equal):
1. try using the groovy+ant workaround as you suggested at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Hadoop#Packager_tips
2. pivot away from the original codehaus jspc plugin to the jetty maven
plugin which should be available with Jetty 9. This will then have
to be presented to Apache upstream as a viable alternative, but
before that we need to resume development on a stable and released
F19 first.
http://www.eclipse.org/jetty/documentation/current/jetty-jspc-maven-plugin.html#jspc-production-precompile
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=4037794
\Pete
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: gmaven
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 00:40:02 +0200
From: gil <puntogil at libero.it>
To: Pete MacKinnon <pmackinn at redhat.com>
hi
gmaven seem at the ens of life
see https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GMAVEN-109
and
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GROOVY/Groovy-Eclipse+compiler+plugin+for+Maven
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GROOVY/Groovy-Eclipse+compiler+plugin+for+Maven#Groovy-EclipsecompilerpluginforMaven-WhyanotherGroovycompilerforMavenWhataboutGMaven
and
https://github.com/groovy/groovy-eclipse/blob/master/extras/groovy-eclipse-batch-builder/build.xml
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries
regards
gil
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/bigdata/attachments/20130612/7e1aa713/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the bigdata
mailing list