Fwd: gmaven

[Peter MacKinnon]

With respect to JSP compilation in Hadoop, I think we should stay the 
course through Fedora 19 
(https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=396972) but this 
is something we'll definitely want to track.

We'll have two options when we need to act (all things being equal):

 1. try using the groovy+ant workaround as you suggested at
    https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Hadoop#Packager_tips
 2. pivot away from the original codehaus jspc plugin to the jetty maven
    plugin which should be available with Jetty 9. This will then have
    to be presented to Apache upstream as a viable alternative, but
    before that we need to resume development on a stable and released
    F19 first.
    http://www.eclipse.org/jetty/documentation/current/jetty-jspc-maven-plugin.html#jspc-production-precompile
    https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=4037794

\Pete



-------- Original Message --------
Subject: 	gmaven
Date: 	Wed, 12 Jun 2013 00:40:02 +0200
From: 	gil <puntogil at libero.it>
To: 	Pete MacKinnon <pmackinn at redhat.com>



hi
gmaven seem at the ens of life
see https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GMAVEN-109
and
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GROOVY/Groovy-Eclipse+compiler+plugin+for+Maven
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GROOVY/Groovy-Eclipse+compiler+plugin+for+Maven#Groovy-EclipsecompilerpluginforMaven-WhyanotherGroovycompilerforMavenWhataboutGMaven
and
https://github.com/groovy/groovy-eclipse/blob/master/extras/groovy-eclipse-batch-builder/build.xml

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries

regards
gil




-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/bigdata/attachments/20130612/7e1aa713/attachment-0001.html>