Don't blame LSB and standards, please: was: Re: Fedora Plasma Product, feedback please

[Christian Schaller]

Well I think the real disagreement here is what the products is supposed to be
about. The WG wants to create an integrated product that is clearly identifiable,
not a 'mix your own' cookbook. We want to the Workstation to be as clearly identifiable
and targetable a product as MacOSX is, while I think you want the workstation to be the 
equivalent of shipping a random desktop system on top of Darwin and still claim it is 'MacOSX'.

Christian



----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" <johannbg at gmail.com>
> To: advisory-board at lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Tuesday, April 1, 2014 1:48:07 PM
> Subject: Re: Don't blame LSB and standards, please: was: Re: Fedora Plasma	Product, feedback please
> 
> 
> On 04/01/2014 11:30 AM, Christian Schaller wrote:
> > Sure, but considering that such a requirements list would include a lot
> > of look and feel, behavior, system service usage, developer API
> > availability
> >   and so on, it would in some cases require quite radical code changes in
> >   the
> > respective desktops.
> 
> You would need to be more specific why that would be necessary since so
> far I dont know of any Gnome specific code that is available to provide
> this functionality or why that would even be requirement for a
> workstation product.
> 
> JBG
> _______________________________________________
> advisory-board mailing list
> advisory-board at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board