Don't blame LSB and standards, please: was: Re: Fedora Plasma Product, feedback please

Christian Schaller cschalle at redhat.com
Tue Apr 1 12:33:44 UTC 2014





----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" <johannbg at gmail.com>
> To: advisory-board at lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Tuesday, April 1, 2014 2:22:24 PM
> Subject: Re: Don't blame LSB and standards, please: was: Re: Fedora Plasma	Product, feedback please
> 
> 
> On 04/01/2014 11:57 AM, Christian Schaller wrote:
> > Well I think the real disagreement here is what the products is supposed to
> > be
> > about. The WG wants to create an integrated product that is clearly
> > identifiable,
> > not a 'mix your own' cookbook. We want to the Workstation to be as clearly
> > identifiable
> > and targetable a product as MacOSX is, while I think you want the
> > workstation to be the
> > equivalent of shipping a random desktop system on top of Darwin and still
> > claim it is 'MacOSX'.
> >
> > Christian
> 
> Which is equivalent of saying that the serverWG should tie them to a
> single server role.

No, the equivalent of that would be the Workstation saying we would only make 
available 1 application for the desktop. I don't follow the server closely, but
last time I heard the plan was to make 'Cockpit' the main server interface
across a range of different server roles.

Christian


More information about the advisory-board mailing list