Pungi configuration file.
Jesse Keating
jkeating at redhat.com
Fri Apr 6 11:57:58 UTC 2007
On Friday 06 April 2007 07:30:59 Joel Andres Granados wrote:
> Been poking at pungi a bit and have found out some strange behavior when
> I used the 0.3.0 version. When I executed the `pungi -c
> /etc/pungi/pungi.conf` I ran across some python trace back that referred
> to looking for a file. On further inspection I realized that the
> comments where not being considered as such for the pung.conf file. At
> http://docs.python.org/dev/lib/module-ConfigParser.html it states that
> the "#" and ";" can be used for comments on the beginning of the line.
> strangely the ";" character can be used as an inline comment but "#" can't.
Ooops. This is totally my fault. I didn't actually test the config file
after I put the comments in right before making the release. Sorry about
that :/
--
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/buildsys/attachments/20070406/465d722c/attachment.bin
More information about the buildsys
mailing list