Pungi configuration file.

Jesse Keating jkeating at redhat.com
Fri Apr 6 11:57:58 UTC 2007


On Friday 06 April 2007 07:30:59 Joel Andres Granados wrote:
> Been poking at pungi a bit and have found out some strange behavior when
> I used the 0.3.0 version.  When I executed the `pungi -c
> /etc/pungi/pungi.conf` I ran across some python trace back that referred
> to looking for a file.  On further inspection I realized that the
> comments where not being considered as such for the pung.conf file.  At
> http://docs.python.org/dev/lib/module-ConfigParser.html it states that
> the "#" and ";" can be used for comments on the beginning of the line.  
> strangely the ";" character can be used as an inline comment but "#" can't.

Ooops.  This is totally my fault.  I didn't actually test the config file 
after I put the comments in right before making the release.  Sorry about 
that :/

-- 
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/buildsys/attachments/20070406/465d722c/attachment.bin 


More information about the buildsys mailing list