[FZH] Fwd: Re: [Ambassadors] FUDCon APAC bids

Simon Yan simonyan at fedoraproject.org
Wed Jun 29 07:02:40 UTC 2011


On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 9:33 PM, Tiansworld
<tiansworld at fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> 感谢 Gerard Braad 这么卖力的宣传我们的本土 Fedora 社区。
> 为了 FUDCON APAC 能在北京举行,我们能不能也活跃一点呢?
> 让 Fedora 知道 Fedora China 要比 India 还要活跃,还有吸引力。
> 而我们能做的,最简单的就是去更新这个 Wiki 页面,让 Fedora 社区知道中文社
> 区的活力:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FUDCon:Bid_for_Beijing_2011/zh
> 之前 Tommy He 已经发了这个 Wiki 的链接,结果后来的讨论水了。
> 在此在下还是希望,做为一个 Fedora 中文社区的成员,一起努力一下吧。
> 谢谢 Gerard Braad
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [Ambassadors] FUDCon APAC bids
> Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 21:00:13 +0800
> From: Gerard Braad <gbraad at fedoraproject.org>
> Reply-To: ambassadors at lists.fedoraproject.org
> To: ambassadors at lists.fedoraproject.org
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 8:38 PM, Jared K. Smith
> <jsmith at fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 11:58 PM, inode0 <inode0 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I've not been very helpful in this discussion and about all I can say
>>> is that Neville is exactly right. I have no idea how one could ever
>>> choose between them without some high-level project goals in mind. I'd
>>> like to select both, one for 2011 and the other for 2012 right now!
>> I think that sentiment is well and good, but I also know that the
>> Malasian team declined to bid for 2011 but would very much like to put
>> together a bid for 2012.  In the interest of fairness, we'll be
>> opening up bids for FUDCon APAC 2012 just as soon as we announce the
>> winning bid for 2011, and shoot to have FUDCon APAC 2012 somewhere in
>> the June/July/August timeframe.
> I believe both communities are important and exactly for the same
> reasons as Neville. I can only say that any help to the Chinese
> community is a win for the long-term. No matter what the outcome will
> be, I am sure this will be seen as an inspiration. However, I am also
> worried that most of the Chinese members are not able to attend the
> Indian FUDCon. As mentioned earlier, it would be wise to have someone
> who can decide for us based on metrics, but also with a good
> understanding of both options.
> About the timeframe for APAC 2012? I would say that is later and
> certainly NOT the ideal period; baking hot temperatures ;-)
> Gerard
> _______________________________________________
> Chinese mailing list
> Chinese at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/chinese

YeeYaa (Simon Yan)


More information about the Chinese mailing list