default size of root fs

[Brian LaMere]

I think the idea is reducing repeated effort.  If 1 person spends an hour,
to keep 1000 people from spending 30 minutes, then time has been saved.
 It's for this reason we don't all write our own kernels!

I, for instance, have the base vanilla image I did with the little
createfedorawhatever script, then I add other stuff for various images.
 That way if I need several more X type systems, I already have them built
out and tada - there they are.  That said, I'm not necessarily the target
audience for the AMI, either.

So the question is - those who are, what will they typically need?  Several
chimed in about the 2G / size, so jforbes has already changed that to 10G
for the next image.  In the mean time, serving things out of the additional
mounts is probably better to do anyway.  My note about that was just for
people who want to resolve issues prior to his releasing the new AMIs.

Brian

On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 10:28 AM, Dima Brodsky <ddbrodsky at gmail.com> wrote:

> You could also build/publish your own custom image of the FC14 image
> but with a 10gig root partition ... that's what I did.
>
> ttyl
> Dima
>
> On 6-Dec-10, at 9:58 AM, Brian LaMere wrote:
>
> > you could always just deploy the lamp stuff to the other two dirs
> > mounted - no reason mysql databases couldn't be in /data, for
> > instance.  /var/lib/mysql doesn't really make that much sense for a
> > place to actually /leave/ it, after all ;)
> >
> > Brian
> >
> > On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 6:03 AM, István <leccine at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Brilliant!
> >
> > . In the meantime I am trying to resize the root fs somehow
> > splitting /dev/xvdc for /var and so on.
> >
> > Thank you guys.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Istvan
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 1:39 PM, Marek Goldmann <mgoldman at redhat.com>
> > wrote
> >
> > Hi Istvan,
> >
> > Yes, we've talked about this before. Whole 10GB will be used for S3-
> > based AMIs once we publish updated AMIs, right Justin?
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > --Marek
> >
> > On 2010-12-05, at 13:10, István wrote:
> >
> > > Hey,
> > >
> > > Don't you think it was a good idea to have at least 10G for / in
> > FC14 EC2 image?
> > >
> > >
> > > 2G is a bit small comparing the available many 100G space, it is
> > hardly enough for typical LAMP installations or any kind of
> > production server even if you store the content in /mnt.
> > >
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Istvan
> > >
> > > --
> > > the sun shines for all
> > >
> > > http://blog.l1x.me
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > cloud mailing list
> > > cloud at lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cloud mailing list
> > cloud at lists.fedoraproject.org
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > the sun shines for all
> >
> > http://blog.l1x.me
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cloud mailing list
> > cloud at lists.fedoraproject.org
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cloud mailing list
> > cloud at lists.fedoraproject.org
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
>
> --
> ddbrodsky at gmail.com
>
> "The price of reliability is the pursuit of the utmost simplicity.
> It is a price which the very rich find the most hard to pay."
>
> (Sir Antony Hoare, 1980)
>
> _______________________________________________
> cloud mailing list
> cloud at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/cloud/attachments/20101206/5f512d54/attachment.html>