Eucalyptus RPM -- random discussion thread

[Jeremy Katz]

On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 12:37 PM, Matthew Miller <mattdm at mattdm.org> wrote:
> Question One:
>
> How attached are we to the upstream subpackage names? I'd like of like to
> change them to more descriptive names:

If they're from separate tarballs, obviously we'd want to match the
naming and have them be separate source packages.  If they're just
subpackages, rename them!  And probably make sure to provide the
upstream names for compatibility's sake, but I'm a big fan of names
that are parseable

- Jeremy