Eucalyptus RPM -- random discussion thread

[Xavier Lamien]

That's perfect. I did some packaging work on eucalyptus few month ago and
went the same way.

On Feb 2, 2010 6:37 PM, "Matthew Miller" <mattdm at mattdm.org> wrote:

Question One:

How attached are we to the upstream subpackage names? I'd like of like to
change them to more descriptive names:


eucalyptus-sc    -> eucalyptus-storage-controller
eucalyptus-cloud -> eucalyptus-cloud-controller
eucalyptus-cc    -> eucalyptus-cluster-controller
eucalyptus-nc    -> eucalyptus-node-controller
eucalyptus-gl    -> eucalyptus-gatherlog

Does anyone have strong opinions on this?



--
Matthew Miller <mattdm at mattdm.org>
Senior Systems Architect -- Instructional & Research Computing Services
Computing & Information Technology
Harvard School of Engineering & Applied Sciences
_______________________________________________
cloud mailing list
cloud at lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/cloud/attachments/20100202/f8feff8c/attachment.html>