Cloud infrastructure package group

Peter Robinson pbrobinson at
Tue Aug 23 21:25:58 UTC 2011

On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 10:09 PM, Stephen John Smoogen <smooge at> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 12:52, David Nalley <david at> wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Bill Nottingham <notting at> wrote:
>>> The HekaFS maintainers were looking for a appropriate group for their
>>> package. I was thinking that perhaps having a 'cloud infrastructure'
>>> or 'cloud support' group might be the best place, but we don't have
>>> one of those, and I'm not sure what all packages should be in it.
>>> Would someone fom the Cloud SIG like to take a stab at it?
>>> Thanks,
>>> Bill
>> While I am happy to do this, haven't we already hit string freeze for
>> F16 (August 2nd per the schedule)? So we are talking about
>> If I were to do so I think I'd put the following in the group:
>> eucatools
>> aeolus
>> deltacloud
>> sheepdog
>> ceph
>> glusterfs
>> hekafs
>> boxgrinder
> I am guessing that there will also be a need to have what is optional
> and required...

I would possibly suggest that they're all optional, there's lots of
different cloud technologies there a lot of which are completely
standalone separate products that aren't required to interoperate. By
having them all optional there's a menu with the list there and people
can select the particular type of cloud technologies they wish to use.


More information about the cloud mailing list