Ceph

[Jonathan Dieter]

On Sat, 2011-11-05 at 22:59 -0400, David Nalley wrote:
> Hi folks,
> 
> I spent some time today trying to get ceph updated, and I pushed 0.37
> to rawhide[0].
> 
> I would like to solicit thoughts on pushing this to F16.
> While this fixes 5 bugs in Fedora's bug tracker (and to be fair, 2 of
> them are easily fixed in the current version) there are a number of
> bugs fixed in the 4 months since 0.31 was released.
> The downside - a number of binaries and libraries have changed name[1],
> Technically this probably runs afoul of the updates policy, but ceph
> appears to be a leaf package if repoquery is to be believed, and it's
> still on the same major version number :). It's also true that there
> isn't really the idea of a supported version of Ceph since it's still
> very rapidly in development and considered quite bleeding edge.
> 
> Thoughts, comments, flames?
> 
> --David
> 
> [0] http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3491795
> [1] http://marc.info/?l=ceph-devel&m=131673402621436&w=2

For what little my opinion is worth, I'd say go for it.

Jonathan
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/cloud/attachments/20111105/f37a5ef6/attachment.sig>