openstack in EPEL status

[Toshio Kuratomi]

On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 09:12:25PM +0100, Steve Traylen wrote:
> 2011/11/17 Pádraig Brady <P at draigbrady.com>:
> > packages to epel. Steve, feel free to tackle webob1.0 (1.0.8).
> > If not I'll do it after I submit python-sqlalchemy0.7 (0.7.3)
> > (after confirming here first).
> 
> The latest is 1.1.1
> http://pypi.python.org/pypi/WebOb
> 
> this is better choice I guess unless there is a reason?
> python-webob11 for a package name.
> 
Just a note: python-webob1.1 would be better (packaging guidelines were
recently updated to allow dots in package names for this purpose.).  You can
ask the upstream if they have any backwards compatibility to version number
policies as well.  Sometimes when a project goes to 1.0 and beyond, they
change their versioning policies so that major number releases are all
compatible.  Other times they stick with the minor number since they've
gotten used to it throughout their 0.x development.

-Toshio
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/cloud/attachments/20111117/1ae78f16/attachment.sig>