Openstack in HTTPD URL Scheme
Daniel P. Berrange
berrange at redhat.com
Mon Apr 30 08:23:18 UTC 2012
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 07:46:48PM -0400, Adam Young wrote:
> On 04/27/2012 06:21 PM, Matt_Domsch at Dell.com wrote:
> >NameVirtualHost localhost?
>
> We can use Virtual hosts to distinguish but that implies either
> separate ports or DNS support. I'd like to stay away from multiple
> ports due to the SELinux port assignments clashing with the ones the
> OPenstack tends to use, but named virtual hosts will work fine.
Is HTTPS support for NamedVirtualHosts widespread enough these
days ? I know there have been issues with this in the past, and
even today it is much harder (and more expensive) to get x509
certs from real authorities for multi-hostnames / wildcards.
Daniel
--
|: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|
More information about the cloud
mailing list