Openstack in HTTPD URL Scheme

Daniel P. Berrange berrange at redhat.com
Mon Apr 30 08:23:18 UTC 2012


On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 07:46:48PM -0400, Adam Young wrote:
> On 04/27/2012 06:21 PM, Matt_Domsch at Dell.com wrote:
> >NameVirtualHost localhost?
> 
> We can use Virtual hosts to distinguish but that implies either
> separate ports or DNS support.  I'd like to stay away from multiple
> ports due to the SELinux port assignments clashing with the ones the
> OPenstack tends to use,  but named virtual hosts will work fine.

Is HTTPS support for NamedVirtualHosts widespread enough these
days ? I know there have been issues with this in the past, and
even today it is much harder (and more expensive) to get x509
certs from real authorities for multi-hostnames / wildcards.


Daniel
-- 
|: http://berrange.com      -o-    http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org              -o-             http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org       -o-         http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org       -o-       http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|



More information about the cloud mailing list