OpenNebula approved

Robyn Bergeron rbergero at redhat.com
Thu Jan 5 21:30:02 UTC 2012


On 01/04/2012 06:29 PM, Jaime Melis wrote:
> Hello Denis,
>
> Thanks a lot for your help, it definitely cleared things up, and 
> happily the process is simpler than what I though it would be, which 
> is nice.
>
> We've made the feature ready for wrangler.
Cool, I will take a look at it and send it over to FESCo for approval if 
it looks good. :)

Thanks!

-Robyn
>
> Thanks again,
> Jaime
>
> On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 3:03 PM, Denis Arnaud 
> <denis.arnaud_fedora at m4x.org <mailto:denis.arnaud_fedora at m4x.org>> wrote:
>
>
>     Dear Jaime,
>
>
>
>         We're a few weeks away from F17 features submission deadline
>         and we've been working hard (especially Shaw Starr - CC) in
>         submitting OpenNebula package dependencies. OpenNebula would
>         even work without those not yet complete dependencies since
>         they're mostly ruby gems which speed up OpenNebula (although
>         we're confident they will all be there for the submission
>         deadline), so we would like to move on to the next stage and
>         start submitting OpenNebula for feature review to get it
>         approved. Could anyone help us out with the process we must
>         follow to get OpenNebula to be an accepted feature?
>
>
>     AFAIU, you can submit the feature for approval by Fesco. There
>     should be a Fesco meeting tonight, I believe. As a reminder, the
>     feature process is described on the Fedora Wiki:
>     https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Policy. In particular, the
>     acceptance criteria
>     (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Policy/Acceptance) seem
>     all be met by OpenNebula.
>     All the tasks of the feature are not required to be completed for
>     the feature approval. Rather, they need to be completed for the
>     Fedora 17 freeze (which will come shortly).
>
>     So, regarding the acceptance process, the only thing you have to
>     do *for now*
>     (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Policy/Milestones), is:
>     "1. The Feature Owner adds the feature page to
>     Category:FeatureReadyForWrangler
>     <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:FeatureReadyForWrangler>
>     by adding the following text to the bottom of their feature page:
>     *Category:FeatureReadyForWrangler
>     <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:FeatureReadyForWrangler>*--it
>     is already in the feature template
>     <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/EmptyTemplate>."
>
>     Note that you can also refer to the features submitted by similar
>     projects: OpenStack
>     (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/OpenStack),
>     (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Aeolus_Conductor),
>     Sheepdog (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Sheepdog) and
>     HekaFS (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/HekaFS) for Fedora
>     16, as well as BoxGrinder
>     (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/BoxGrinder) for Fedora 15.
>
>     Does it seem clearer?
>
>     Best regards
>
>     Denis
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Jaime Melis
> Project Engineer
> OpenNebula - The Open Source Toolkit for Cloud Computing
> www.OpenNebula.org <http://www.OpenNebula.org> | jmelis at opennebula.org 
> <mailto:jmelis at opennebula.org>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cloud mailing list
> cloud at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/cloud/attachments/20120105/7ecc89bb/attachment.html>


More information about the cloud mailing list