Minutes from today's (12/04/2013) cloud WG meeting

Dennis Gilmore dennis at ausil.us
Thu Dec 5 22:21:17 UTC 2013


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

El Thu, 05 Dec 2013 15:26:14 -0500
James Antill <james at fedoraproject.org> escribió:
> On Thu, 2013-12-05 at 13:45 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 05:13:40PM -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > > > > So we are not going to be able to do this period. you will
> > > > > only be able to release as Fedora itself releases.  doing
> > > > > periodic updated images can be doable
> [...]
> > >               I think that some of the wording used is poorly
> > > chosen. I think you are actually talking about updates images and
> > > not release images. We have no way to determine how big an update
> > > set is so that
> > 
> > I'm not sure I understand the distinction you are making here. The
> > images would need to be stand-alone, with all packages included,
> > not just updates.
> 
>  I _think_ Dennis here is talking about the difference between
> fedora/updates ... and that if we have a "release" image of say F21
> then that would be thought of like the fedora tree/repo. and couldn't
> be changed ever. But that's not we want to do anyway.
>  And we could do "update" images, which would be new images in
> addition to the release image (what we all want, I think).

James is pretty spot on, a release image would be F20 F21 F22 etc and
updates image would be F20+updates. its to do with the fedora release
the images line up with.

note if we have 3 supported fedora releases at a time we would need to
be making and testing 3 lots of updates images. 

Dennis
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
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=nbgt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


More information about the cloud mailing list