Fedora Cloud Working Group (members, everyone, and what's next)

[Frankie Onuonga]

Hi guys,

Thanks for the email.
I think I am happy with what is planned out so far.
I am willing to help in every way.
I will be on the channel if anyone needs me.

thanks.

Kind Regards,

Onuonga Frankie



On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 6:48 PM, Sandro "red" Mathys
<red at fedoraproject.org>wrote:

> On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 7:12 PM, Robyn Bergeron <rbergero at redhat.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: "Matthew Miller" <mattdm at fedoraproject.org>
> >> To: "Fedora Cloud SIG" <cloud at lists.fedoraproject.org>
> >> Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2013 9:33:43 AM
> >> Subject: Fedora Cloud Working Group (members, everyone, and what's next)
> >>
> >> Hello everyone. FESCo has approved the initial slate of voting members
> in
> >> the Fedora Cloud Working Group. That is:
> >>
> >>  * James Antill
> >>  * Robyn Bergeron
> >>  * Joe Brockmeier
> >>  * Haïkel Guémar
> >>  * Sam Kottler
> >>  * Sandro Mathys
> >>  * Matthew Miller
> >>  * Frankie Onuonga
> >>  * Mattias Runge
> >>
> >> Our next two steps are to 1) document a governance model and 2) start
> >> working on a product requirements document.
> >>
> >> As we work on these things, we'll need a place to communicate. I suggest
> >> that we primarily use this list, plus chat on #fedora-cloud on
> Freenode. We
> >> have some geographical distribution -- I'm going to try to see if we can
> >> find a time for an IRC meeting at least initially.
> >>
> >> This doesn't mean that we're taking over this list for just this
> purpose --
> >> the Cloud SIG remains a place to talk about and work on all things
> cloud,
> >> and I think we can handle the overlap (especially since it's not
> super-high
> >> traffic). Also, as I hope I've made clear, the working group can't
> possibly
> >> do all of the things that needs to be done; everyone on the committee
> will
> >> have an active role in actually doing things, but we also will act as
> >> enablers for other people's contributions.
> >>
> >> Unless anyone objects, or is really, really excited about doing it, I'm
> >> going to start on a basic strawman governance document. Things like what
> >> constitues a binding vote, how we handle succession that kind of thing.
> Then
> >> we can discuss and improve that. This needs to be done by November 15th,
> >> although I'm kind of hoping that it'll be so uncomplicated that it won't
> >> take that long.
> >>
> >> Likewise, I can start on a skeleton for a PRD, but if anyone in the
> group
> >> has more experience at doing that than I have (I come from a sysadmin
> >> background, not one where I've worked on shipping products) I'll
> happily and
> >> immediately defer. (This, by the way, needs to be done by January
> >> somethingth, which sounded a long way away when this idea was drafted
> but
> >> doesn't anymore when I look at the holiday calendar.)
> >
> > I can hack out the basic framework for a PRD, I have been through those
> processes a zillion times.
> >
> > (Granted, my ability to actually fill it out with technical jargon that
> makes any sense may be limited, but it can give us a start anyway...
> normally i have come at this from the angle of making a marketing req. doc.
> - "what people want to have as far as usability / functionality" and that
> drives what technical bits come together in the PRD to make those wants
> happen, but i am sure we can wing it.)
>
> Thanks Matt and Robyn, for getting these things started. Just ping the
> list whenever you feel someone should look over what's already there
> or fill in some technical jargon. -- Sandro
> _______________________________________________
> cloud mailing list
> cloud at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/cloud/attachments/20131024/3baa13b6/attachment-0001.html>