image architecture -- probably no 32-bit for docker, big data?

Julien Eid jeid64 at gmail.com
Wed Apr 30 16:32:27 UTC 2014


Agreed, it doesn't make sense to keep 32bit images for these.


On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 12:19 PM, Sam Kottler <s at shk.io> wrote:

> On 2014-04-30 21:55, Matthew Miller wrote:
>
>> I know we discussed keeping the 32-bit image around, but I don't think we
>> actually covered the specialized images.
>>
>> Docker doesn't even support 32 bit hosts -- it may someday, but even then,
>> the assumption of most containers is gonna be 64-bit x86_64.
>>
>> And I don't think it makes sense to have a 32-bit big data image, but
>> maybe
>> I'm wrong on that for certain workloads?
>>
>
> +1 on only supporting a 64-bit image at least for big data and docker. I
> can't think of any tools or applications thereof that would make sense to
> run 32-bit but maybe mattf, willb, or others know of some?
>
> _______________________________________________
> cloud mailing list
> cloud at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/cloud/attachments/20140430/d43905b1/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the cloud mailing list