default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification

[Rahul Sundaram]

Hi


On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 1:00 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:

> No, that isn't true.  Without wide adoption you may not have any
> impetus for btrfs to get better.  However, it getting better is
> dependent upon wider development, maintenance, and testing.  I'm not
> sure we are in a position to actually do that, and that is the bulk of
> my hesitation.  Throwing something upon Fedora users as a default with
> the hopes that it will improve is pretty horrible in my opinion,
> particularly if we aren't able to actually fix things they find.
>

Does Fedora or more specifically Red Hat have anyone working on Btrfs
upstream that can help guide the path forward?  It can't be possibly be the
right decision to let Btrfs be struck in the current position for too long.

Rahul
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/cloud/attachments/20140226/f39fcb89/attachment.html>