Google Compute Engine Fedora Images (status update)

Vaidas Jablonskis jablonskis at gmail.com
Thu Jan 23 11:32:09 UTC 2014


Hi Dennis,

So if I understand correctly, I have to sign an NDA to be able to freely
upload Fedora cloud images onto GCE even for testing?

If that's the case, could you give me more information who I should contact
or where should I look for more information on getting this NDA signed?

Any help is appreciated!

Thanks,
Vaidas



On 22 January 2014 02:49, Dennis Gilmore <dennis at ausil.us> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> El Wed, 22 Jan 2014 00:24:31 +0000
> Vaidas Jablonskis <jablonskis at gmail.com> escribió:
> > Hi People,
> >
> > I am pretty new to contributing to Fedora, especially the cloud group.
> >
> > I have mentioned a few times on IRC (nickname: zooz) that I have
> > started working on GCE cloud image.
> >
> > So I thought I will give you an update on my progress so other people
> > can jump in or help me to figure out the process.
> >
> > So far so good, GCE image does not seem to look much different that
> > already existing OpenStack/EC2 images.
> >
> > - kickstart files for appliance-creator:
> > https://github.com/vaijab/fedora-gce-image
> >
> > - gcimagebundle spec/srpm/copr:
> > https://github.com/vaijab/gcimagebundle-rpm
> >
> > - google-compute-daemon spec/srpm/copr:
> > https://github.com/vaijab/google-compute-daemon-rpm
> >
> > I understand that you guys might not want to use google provided
> > daemons for managing ssh keys, users and forwarded IP addresses, but
> > I thought I will package it up just in case.
> >
> > Current blockers: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055181
> > but they accepted my patch and it's been submitted to
> > updates-testing, so it should be fine soon.
> >
> > So with what I currently have, I am able to build an image without any
> > issues which runs on GCE perfectly.
> >
> >
> > If anyone could have a quick poke at my RPM spec files and let me
> > know if there are any major issues with them before I submit them for
> > a review for the first time :-) Also if anyone wants to sponsor my
> > fedora packager membership I'd really appreciate that.
> >
> >
> > So what are the next steps? How do we actually start a process of
> > getting appliance KS files upstream?
> >
> > Any pointers and feedback is welcome. If anyone wants to jump in and
> > help - please do so!
>
> afaik the existing images hsould work just fine, cloud-init may need
> some tweaking to work right. The issue we have AFAIK is that you have
> to sign a NDA to upload images, That is not something we are able to
> do. We will need to send a request to Red Hat legal via Fedora Legal to
> come to some agreement.
>
> Dennis
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJS3zGvAAoJEH7ltONmPFDRJkEQANIunhCTs+Dfe7KoBKt3QuZu
> sgY47n67YSt/Ftfo2KpSYRIMjlHslr4hF5YMjFTz2Ec5METDdTaj7iP5SwlKCmjB
> akWKxCeCqRua+s7k8CgSLQlyOlVigUxD2+aMIO2MD2BvGVYWos/PJuSdGJnXkJRQ
> QRHHKs81HkXer4vwgwWMHxj8nvlBIIgusqa4Eh9MvmIFgdvWiAkHnVo8w7xUhRWS
> TzIjzAXOA5mf3Lf+ZWF2xyZ9nhUuvyxpxdiCvqJ3w+1H6P5X9/WCebgXIY37tqmB
> 3qzBjkP6wTb+ehU+UdHxrB/s7MFn3ZRfTAwq+z2xRL4G1NfZT1Mm1yRMmxNQ9ulm
> Hq61LYEbTt4+2aJcLKx4muzDHxlP0jIN1LFOgz912dqlIo/UcoYKASzIbx5pJ4do
> yLmeiHQ73xlmwNAt38RYsJ/NgNlFriw0BNDMtr2XmkNZWe84BPRqGZHDS2cs7s9W
> 9NE5qRUpVEF1kaC6Aq9qqnB/YBf6ZnZKZECNY9X7cKDPS0jiWNDS6LVOFLBgaBCa
> hdBnX4O5LywgyNP9tEfcV1iFQQ8t1E7mPZFqg2t4Qo5uLl0IbUxM0EGDLHC7E01S
> WByOS1S2i+GsEPJOz0KB9GKgpgibYSj3ZZa/TIr/oaIeWy2HX/d9iuFztk1K+jNW
> wcoByJwVeiIWhwxQPKEr
> =v6Z2
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> _______________________________________________
> cloud mailing list
> cloud at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
>



-- 
Vaidas Jablonskis
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/cloud/attachments/20140123/dd50ff63/attachment.html>


More information about the cloud mailing list