Fedora.next QA planning: generic / Product-specific release criteria and blocker review issues

[Matthew Miller]

On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 10:59:31AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> >> I'm of the opinion that we should keep the blocker process
> >> unified until and unless that becomes impossible. The only
> >> benefit I can think of to separating them would be metrics, and I
> >> cannot measure the degree to which I don't care about metrics :)
> > I think we should care about metrics, and I think this would be
> > very useful to track, even though I agree it'd be better to combine
> > into one actual process at this point.
> I specifically meant "metrics about whether issues are specific to one
> Fedora release or another". I should probably start drinking coffee.

Coffee is delicious. But even in a highly caffeinated state, I'm curious why
you don't think this specific thing is interesting. Unless you are saying
that it's immeasurable because you *care so much*. :)

-- 
Matthew Miller    --   Fedora Project    --    <mattdm at fedoraproject.org>
                                  "Tepid change for the somewhat better!"
-- 
desktop mailing list
desktop at lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop