Proposed Cloud release criteria for F21
Dusty Mabe
dustymabe at gmail.com
Tue Oct 7 20:40:26 UTC 2014
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 10:38:26PM -0600, Mike Ruckman wrote:
> Hello fellow Fedorans! I told cloud@ that I would work on some criteria to go
> over, and here's what I have so far. These are pretty rough, but I think
> they're servicable enough for the time being. There are only two I've thought
> of for Beta, but I'm probably forgetting something. Patches welcome :) Here
> they are:
>
> === Growroot ===
>
> Release blocking cloud images must be able to automatically utilize all
> available space on a supported volume.
> [Supported Volume?]
> -> PVM, HVM volumes, basically, growroot should work without breaking on both
> types of volumes.
>
> === Cloud-init ===
>
> The cloud-init package must be functional for release blocking cloud images.
> [Functional?]
> -> the provided cloud-init package needs to work, but we won't block
> on issues that EC2 or Openstack have with their service providing
> said meta-data.
>
> Looking through the existing criteria we either need to update the existing
> pages, create a cloud criteria page or be willing to handwave away criteria
> that don't apply (for instance, GUI updates don't apply to cloud images). I'm
> fine with the handwavy answer - I don't know that codifying every detail in the
> wiki actually adds any value.
>
> That being said, there were some general edits I would make to the current beta
> criteria:
>
> ----- Clarifications -----
>
> * Define "supported configurations" in the "Release-blocking images must boot"
> criteria to include all of the products.
>
> * Note that cloud installations don't need to be able to upgraded from release
> to release (this might be wrong though)
>
> * I would alter the "Shutdown, reboot, logout" criteria say "system" instead of
> "desktop" since I'm sure all products want to be able to do all those things.
>
> Currently, that's all the input I have for the current release criteria. Each
> of the new criteria would require new Testcases to be written. If anyone has any
> feedback on any of these, it would be appreciated. Like Adam said in his Server
> proposal, it would be good to get these taken care of ASAP as we have a TC
> landing sometime tonight (I know, I know, it's a little late - but I think these
> criteria fit the *intent* everyone has had so far).
>
> Any feedback would be great! Thanks!
>
> PS - Feel free to ping me on IRC if you have any questions.
Looks good to me. +1
Dusty
More information about the cloud
mailing list