Starting the Talking Points for F22

[Joe Brockmeier]

On 04/14/2015 09:50 AM, Colin Walters wrote:
> 
> 
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2015, at 09:41 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 08:31:49AM -0400, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
>>> Here's what I'd say, lemme know if this sounds sane:
>> [...]
>>> So we've decided that while the technologies are maturing so rapidly,
>>> it's better have a fast-moving remix or spin that gives users the
>>> opportunity to use a Fedora-based Atomic Host and gives our developers
>>> the ability to move fast and break things if needed."
>>
>> That works for me. Any volunteers for actually working on making
>> http://atomic.fedoraproject.org/?
> 
> And to clarify, we're then backing out all of the Atomic bits in Fedora 22
> mainline rel-eng such as the repository and cloud image, vagrant box,
> and installer?

No - the plan is still to deliver F22 Atomic, though it's non-blocking.
But we will not be doing an "official" F23 Atomic.

Best,

jzb
-- 
Joe Brockmeier | Principal Cloud & Storage Analyst
jzb at redhat.com | http://community.redhat.com/
Twitter: @jzb  | http://dissociatedpress.net/

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/cloud/attachments/20150414/0a5521c8/attachment.sig>