Starting the Talking Points for F22

Matthew Miller mattdm at fedoraproject.org
Wed Apr 15 01:31:09 UTC 2015


On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 06:14:13PM -0700, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
> That seems like a missing step in the test / QA process - one which
> I've been force to script in my own testing process for releasing on
> F22. Weren't the F21 Docker images posted to Docker Hub for anyone to
> test at some point before final release? Admittedly I haven't looked
> at the formal test pages on the wiki so I don't know if it's there or
> not. Also, the test compose / release candidate cycle doesn't always
> deliver a Docker image tarball - RC1 had one but RC2 doesn't.

Part of the problem is that the docker image upload process is actually
a manual pull request on github. I cc'd Lokesh, who has been handling
this (thanks Lokesh!) and can maybe fill in more.

[and, switching topics]

> My Atomic use case is quite narrow and outside what I think is the
> "mainstream" Atomic use case. I'm using it as a Docker host running
> under Windows 8.1 and Windows 10 Client Hyper-V in place of
> Boot2Docker or Docker Machine. Almost any Atomic build will do that
> now but I'm looking for something that is slower-moving than a full
> release every two weeks. A full release every Fedora release is ideal
> but since that's been ruled out, the next best thing is a CentOS
> Atomic that tracks RHEL Atomic.

It's not completely ruled out; we're just not feeling ready for it yet.


-- 
Matthew Miller
<mattdm at fedoraproject.org>
Fedora Project Leader


More information about the cloud mailing list