SCLs and Cloud Re: Cloud image use cases

[Matt Micene]

TBH, I'm not sure what can be done from the outside either.

Not part of either the SCL team or FPC, all I see is what tickets and
meeting logs I can find.  So I'm not close enough to the issues either side
is bringing up to understand if there's a "customer" argument to be made
for "perfect is the enemy of good" in this case.

I just know I really like SCLs, how they work, and the capabilities.  It's
a big differentiator for the distro at large, and could be really useful
for the envisioned Cloud end-user.  I don't want to step on nuanced
discussions of over 18+ months though.

- Matt M



On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 12:04 PM, Joe Brockmeier <jzb at redhat.com> wrote:

> On 07/10/2015 04:59 PM, Matt Micene wrote:
> > I think the Cloud SIG should be jumping up and down on getting SCLs back
> > on track.
>
> What would this entail? I haven't been following that closely. I'm aware
> that SCLs have been... contentious.
> --
> Joe Brockmeier | Community Team, OSAS
> jzb at redhat.com | http://community.redhat.com/
> Twitter: @jzb  | http://dissociatedpress.net/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cloud mailing list
> cloud at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/cloud/attachments/20150710/1c768bad/attachment.html>