Atomic 2 week releases

[Joe Brockmeier]

On 03/13/2015 02:20 PM, Michael P. McGrath wrote:
> Perhaps we're already aligned then.  What would Fedora pick as its 'best'
> Atomic release and how often does it get released?

Not exclusively my call, of course, but I would choose the rapid-release
version over a version that follows the standard Fedora release cycle.
That is, of course, if we can consistently produce an Atomic host that
is usable without serious breakage.

We are on the hook for an Atomic Host release for F22, but I think I'd
rather message why we're putting our weight behind a rapid-release host
based on Fedora than dealing with two competing Fedora-based offerings.

Best,

jzb
-- 
Joe Brockmeier | Project Atomic Doer of Things
jzb at redhat.com | http://community.redhat.com/
Twitter: @jzb  | http://dissociatedpress.net/

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/cloud/attachments/20150313/ab65c67c/attachment-0001.sig>